4anarki said on May 21, 2008

GOOD IDEA FOR SURE
a Woman is the best candidate for Politics

See Germany,Switzerland,Spain,Sweeden ....lots of Woman in Key Position

this is a WIN WIN Situation

get the power to the Women!!!!!!!

fredo2010 said on May 21, 2008

Women in power could be a good thing look at the UK from about 1979 for roughly 12 years "The Iron Lady" Margaret Thatcher, no-one fucked with her

agaru-tattoo said on May 23, 2008

I'd really just like to see a quasi-honest politician in DC. (Black, White, Male, Female, Catholic, Atheist... I don't give a shit, just give me my tax-money's worth!)
The first official that says:

"OK, I'm gonna steal a lot. I'm gonna get my crony buddies rich. I'm going to make millions on illegal lobbyist bribes, and make sure my friends avoid prosecution for crime committed on my behalf... but I'm gonna do some good shit too...."
THEY GET MY VOTE!

I think Hillary is a "Republican in sheep's clothing". She's killing her own party by continuing in the race (A "slim-at-best" chance is not enough reason to continue spending money & wasting TV time on other POSSIBLE nominees & their positions, and more specifically, demonizing "one of her own" (Barrack) more than McCain!

loseyourfaith said on May 23, 2008

a female president could be good. just not hillary fucking clinton.

4anarki said on May 23, 2008

ha h ah ah aguru u rock...but i was thinking WOMENS are ...not so corrupted like a man
well...we really need to make sure we talk about woman
(at the Olimpic games...a woman is tested to be real woman) and i do not know how deep Condoleza or Hillary was teted...are we shure they are eral womens LOL

johnc said on May 25, 2008

Yes, but "NOT HILLARIOUS CLINTON!! "

ruebenmarley said on June 5, 2008

I'm still trying to deal with what I see here in China... these lads need to start showing women more respect, because pretty soon the girls are gonna start some kind of revolution over here.

agaru-tattoo said on June 6, 2008

No need to debate this now... It looks like Obama is a lock after Saturday... As I predicted.
Now, I'm sure Hillary will be offered the VP spot, and we get the black AND female stigma behind us...

Its just like pro wrestling in the 80s....it's supposed to LOOK REAL, but its all carefully planned. It's easy to predict the next government move if you know what their agenda is! LOL!

sirgrimm said on June 6, 2008

agaru-tattoo said:
No need to debate this now... It looks like Obama is a lock after Saturday... As I predicted.
Now, I'm sure Hillary will be offered the VP spot, and we get the black AND female stigma behind us...

Its just like pro wrestling in the 80s....it's supposed to LOOK REAL, but its all carefully planned. It's easy to predict the next government move if you know what their agenda is! LOL!

what do you believe their agenda is?

agaru-tattoo said on June 7, 2008

That's a HUGE, and complicated answer (And I will of course be labeled as a "conspiracy nut") but, here's the simple answer:

The Federal Reserve/Banking System in the USA is a privately run company. It was created by the big names/money of the early 1900's. (Rothschild, HP Morgan, Rockefeller, etc..) As a privately run company, they LOAN MONEY to the US government... at interest.

So, by definition: They OWN the United States. Or if you're not so dramatic, view it as CEO's who manage the "economic operations" from behind the scenes.

Over the past few decades computers, security measures, census, public profiles, etc... have made it easy for these people to determine buying/selling practices, and furthermore can utilize "system shocks" to increase their profits, and manipulate the economy. So, for example:

We start a war with Iraq: Costing the govt. apx 1.5 BILLION per day. All of this money is BORROWED, at interest from this PRIVATE FIRM, that also happens to run the IRS... (By the way, it's technically unconstitutional to be FORCED into paying your federal income tax!) So, in essence: War means PROFIT.
Secondly, they control the deficit. The only reason we have inflation is when THEY print more money than our GNP. (Gross National Profit). "Spending trends" are created during wars, TV shows, commercials, tragedies, etc... it's all able to be calculated. If you know what the odds are of a person:
a) Saving money
b) Spending it on cheap consumables
c) Investing money
d) etc...
Then you know how to make even more profits.

"Give me control of a nations currency, and I care not who makes it's laws" -Rothschild

So basically, these diabolical assholes run our government from behind the scenes: 9/11, Iraq, Iran, Oil Crisis, Food Crisis, Afghanistan, etc... can all be predicted (NOT in a spooky, psychic manner) but by applying logic. Every war we've fought over the past 100 years has been planned long in advance. Because it makes TRILLIONS. I have blogs posted on my myspace from over 4 months ago "predicting" the race. It's not odds. Or luck. It's math.

1) Obama will take the throne next. This is because we need a Democratic (minority) representative in office. This will strengthen the (Soon coming) national programs aimed at the black community SPECIFICALLY to elevate their class/status. The powers that be fear the illegal (Tax Free) Mexican workers, and we will need the blacks to be placated. It will also give the illusion of progress.

2) Hillary will take the VP seat. (This will kill two birds with one stone: A black & female in office.) The democratic party will appear to "Fix" the budget, and economic status will again take an upswing... I predict the Dems to hold office for the next 3 terms, and wouldn't be shocked if Hillary ran for 2016 after 2 terms as Vice. THEN ANOTHER TRAGEDY. The Republicans will scream that "Our defenses have been stripped away by the liberals!" And the whole damn mess starts all over again.

1) Carter was a liberal Democrat, but was viewed as weak, and got the Russians thinking...

2) Regan was elected because we needed to fight Russia!
(He nearly collapsed us with his deficit) But it was part of the plan to help bankrupt the USSR, and solidify our spot as the ONLY super-power.

3) Bush fought for HIS OIL in Iraq, but continued to deflate the economy.

4) Clinton got in, and we had the largest surplus in history. He partially was able to do this by "Down sizing" the military.

5) Bush was "sort of" elected, and 9/11 happened. He fucked EVERYTHING up, and now the people demand a Democrat to save the economy....

6) Obama/Clinton will fix the economy, end the wars, and get us back on track...

But around 2016 we will be due for another war, or attack, or SOMETHING to make the people vote Republican. And the cycle will continue.
It's all bullshit. It's about money for the top, and keeping the public occupied with TV, Junk Food, and Toys.
The will lower our standards for health, education, & nutrition. They hope eventually, we'll be too fat, lazy, tired, stupid, and in debt to resist.

Then it's a NEW WORLD ORDER.

ruebenmarley said on June 8, 2008

How do you think China fits into this equation? As the world's leading producer of cheap consumables, and the current reigning champ on the list of underdog countries, I suspect there will be a shift in the USA's focus on the Middle East... and a little over to the Far East.

agaru-tattoo said on June 9, 2008

ruebenmarley said:
How do you think China fits into this equation? As the world's leading producer of cheap consumables, and the current reigning champ on the list of underdog countries, I suspect there will be a shift in the USA's focus on the Middle East... and a little over to the Far East.

Agreed. I don't think it's coincidence that the "World" is watching China due to their hosting of the upcoming Olympics... Their dirty laundry is getting aired out on national TV, and building support against them as a "Human Rights Violator". In 15-20 years (After the Middle East has been established as a make-shift "gas station", with US bases permanently entrenched) the focus will indeed shift toward the East. Japan will be a strong ally (Especially if we "allow them" to build a military again), as will India. The mud-slinging will begin AFTER Mexico is adopted into the North American Union (OUR PERSONAL cheap labor facility, thus replacing China as our "cheap stuff" provider.)

Most likely, we'll instigate a war with them in the same way we did all the others:

WWI: The sinking of the "Lusitania". It killed a few American civilians (Causing an outrage, and a demand for vengeance), even though it was PROVEN to be carrying enemy munitions... making it a viable target. Germany even posted a warning in the New York Post NOT TO BOARD THAT SHIP.

WWII: We forced Japan into attacking us, after we sized their US money, put a trade embargo on them, and blockaded the Pacific (Using the newly acquired Hawaii as a platform) We've attacked other nations "unprovoked" for MUCH LESS!

Vietnam: Gulf of Tonkin Incident. (It didn't even happen, but it was used for propaganda to incite American fury.)

Iraq/Afghanistan: We were in Iraq for WMD's... right? (But it was proven to be bullshit.) Oh, then it was for "Peace-keeping" and to overthrow Saddam Hussein? (Turns out, we REALLY fucked that place up, and we simply handed Saddam to the Kurds for a rail-road trial.) So why are we still there?
Once he was dead, we could stay there to establish "Democracy"... and by the way, Democracy only works if the populace isn't in a civil war, they are educated, and their religious beliefs put them at odds with civil liberties. And don't get me started on Afghanistan and Osama Bin Laden: OUR GOVERNMENT perpetrated 9/11 to start an illegal war for oil profits, and establish a US force in the middle eastern region.

Seems to me, it might be a good place to build up for an Asian assault their too... it's closer, and most of the borders separating us are allies (Or at least afraid of us!)

suicideblonde said on July 27, 2008

Wow !! I really have no idea what any of that meant..:(

freako104 said on July 30, 2008

I think it would depend upon how she acts and what she does.

agaru-tattoo said on August 1, 2008

suicideblonde said:
Wow !! I really have no idea what any of that meant..:(

I can explain each point you have trouble with, in detail, if you'd like? (I think it's important for people to know the truth about politics, not propaganda!)

4anarki said on August 8, 2008

agaru....u rigth !

we have the choice...

what make me afraid is :
the most of us are afraid to think
the most of us are afraid to find out that "it's only a game"

well...we have really the choice

i (long time ago) decided to make a joke out of everything
as i was sure...i cannot win against the system
i can only try to understand
i can try to make it beter (at list arround me)
i can try to grow my children and make sure they do not get manipulated by the propaganda

we only belive China and Russia use the "propaganda" machine
our country are not beter !!!
we have manager that get 20000000 dollar in the year!
and nobody stand up and say "WTF IS THIS???'"
we accept and ...we shut up...and we stay by side watching family with no money to pay surgery...with no money to pay education and...we still shut up

so...agaru...u are rigth and you have a lot of positive energy
i would love to sit down and have a drink with you

and...i still continue my way ...shouting FUCK THE SYSTEM

as ...also if only 10% of the people understand...only 1% will have the "balls" to stand up ..get up...for the figth

love to all off you

luke2269 said on August 18, 2008

im australian and the queen is still in charge. so prob wouldnt be too big of a deal.